Welcome! Becoming a registered user of ShortWingPipers.Org is free and easy! Click the "Register" link found in the upper right hand corner of this screen. It's easy and you can then join the fun posting and learning about Short Wing Pipers!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Landing light-4509 or 4509Q?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Victoria, Texas
    Posts
    212

    Re: Landing light-4509 or 4509Q?

    One thing for sure, when I taxi at night I want it lit up like Arlington Stadium. So both will work just fine. O.K.... Now that were're out of the hangar. How do you set up the taxi light on the 22/20? Does the taxi light (or both) get repositioned to a lower angle to compensate for the conversion to the tailswagger? I haven't checked mine yet to see if they have that much adjustment.

    Lou S.

  2. #12

    Re: Landing light-4509 or 4509Q?

    In case anyone is still wanting to know the difference between the Q (quartz) and a conventional lamp, the quartz ones give out more light for the same power by running hotter. Normally this would cause the tungsten filament to evaporate quickly, darkening the glass and causing the filament to thin and fail rather quickly. However, they also contain iodine or bromine that cleverly stops the evaporation problem. The hotter filament needs a quartz bulb envelope to avoid problems due to normal glass softening when hot, hence the name.

    Keep an eye on the materials near the bulb in case they also become affected by the heat, but considering the lights are not on for extended periods, and some people on here are already using them without problem, you should be OK with them. Dave.

  3. #13

    Re: Landing light-4509 or 4509Q?

    Great information. Thanks Dave.
    Steve Pierce

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Langwarrin - Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    347

    I have just pulled the lights out of the wing and bugger it - I dropped one - now the filament is floating around on it's own.

    The wiring to the lights appears big enough to run a small town - and looks like Piper original. I am going to replace both the wiring and the sealed beams but before I do, has anyone got any leads on an LED replacement for the originals?

  5. #15

    This HID light system is pretty awesome. We compared them to standard bulbs and there was a major difference plus the longevity of the bulbs. http://www.aerohilights.com/
    Steve Pierce

  6. #16

    Curly and all
    Been digging around for any and all valid info on the 4509 Q4509 4509Q and any other APPROVED for my little PA??
    so far the most cost effective and approved or approvable (sp) is the Q4509.
    a brighter and lower power solution is the HID systems that cost around $500 and will take a 337

    Yes Dave is indeed correct the Q bulb does run hotter....at the inner quartz bulb. It must.
    however the difference in temp on the outer envelope is well within the acceptable limits for our Pipers and this has been documented well.
    At this point it is a question of lumins per dollar vs life time per dollar.

    life for 4509 is stated at 25 hr with a nominal price about $10.00 at your local NAPA or....
    nowthe Q4509 is stated at 100hr again with a nominal price of $20-$40 AND it does give a bit more light ~100k cp vs `120 cp
    so for about the same price per hr the Q4509 is just about the same price with about 1/3 the labor considering one would need to replace the 4509 3 more time to reach the expected 100 hr service life of a Q4509

    now if one is VERY power starved....no alternator or generator, and running totally off batteries then cutting your current down and running a 35W HID system for $500 might be reasonable.

    For me,
    If I could get the Q4509s for around $20..... Go for it.
    if in doubt have your A&P fill out your logbook for the installation from a 4509 to a Q4509

    It is a minor alteration.
    Last edited by 51-pa22; 04-20-2010 at 08:26 AM. Reason: typo

  7. #17

    Not to be critical But: I challenge whether the "Q" bulb really does run hotter. Here is my reasoning. Both bulbs consume 100 watts of energy. All light bulbs produce both heat and light with that energy. The bulb that produces more light should produce less heat. Any thoughts by you all?

  8. #18

    Take a look at the following.
    http://zeiss-campus.magnet.fsu.edu/articles/lightsources/images/tungstenlampsfigure1.jpg&imgrefurl

    It is a bit more information than you may have wanted.
    It may, though, answer some questions about a standard 4509 vs a Q4509
    enjoy


  9. #19
    smcnutt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    346

    Just as a follow-up, I ended up purchasing the straight 4509 just to be safe. However, when I actually replaced the bulb the burned out one WAS a Q4509. Since I had already purchased the non-Q version (actually bought two) I just put that one in and still have one as a spare. In essence I just inadvertently down-graded. When the next bulb burns out I'm not sure if I will put in the extra 4509 I have sitting on the shelf or go ahead a buy a Q4509 - probably the latter.
    Light travels faster than sound.
    That's why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

  10. #20

    What to do with old light bulbs? The FAR's say that your aircraft battery should load checked annually. This becomes way more important if you fly IFR. If your charging system fails it is what is left in the battery that has to supply electricity while you get down in a hurry. The test is done by putting a known load on the battery and timing how long the battery will actually supply that power. A bank of 5 or 10 landing lights or automotive headlights works well for the load in this test. WAyne

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts